![]() Generally more pieces or an aggregate of more powerful pieces means greater chances of winning. Care must therefore be taken to avoid them unless they are compensated by another valuable asset, such as the possibility to develop an attack.Ī material advantage applies both strategically and tactically. Weaknesses in the pawn structure, such as isolated, doubled, or backward pawns and holes, once created, are usually permanent. Since pawns are the most immobile and least valuable of the pieces, the pawn structure is relatively static and largely determines the strategic nature of the position. a bishop pair usually coordinates better than a bishop plus a knight), and the type of position (knights are generally better in closed positions with many pawns, while bishops are more powerful in open positions).Īnother important factor in the evaluation of chess positions is the pawn structure or pawn skeleton. advanced pawns are usually more valuable than those on their starting squares), coordination between pieces (e.g. These basic values are modified by other factors such as the position of the pieces (e.g. The fighting value of the king in the endgame is approximately four points. Usually pawns are considered to be worth one point, knights and bishops three points each, rooks five points, and queens nine points. The point values used for this purpose are based on experience. The most basic way to evaluate one's position is to count the total value of pieces on both sides. Many chess coaches thus emphasize the study of tactics as the most efficient way to improve one's results in serious chess play. Until players reach the skill level of " master", chess tactics tend to ultimately decide the outcomes of games more often than strategy. This distinction affects the immediacy with which a sought-after plan should take effect. having more valuable pieces or better pawn structure), which tend to persist for many moves, from dynamic imbalances (such as one player having an advantage in piece development), which are temporary. Some authors distinguish static strategic imbalances (e.g. Chess strategy is distinguished from chess tactics, which is the aspect of play concerned with the move-by-move setting up of threats and defenses. diagonals, open files, and individual squares). ![]() While evaluating a position strategically, a player must take into account such factors as the relative value of the pieces on the board, pawn structure, king safety, position of pieces, and control of key squares and groups of squares (e.g. Any halfway decent chess buff will be able to see what you’re angling for from a mile away.Aspect of chess play concerned with long-term goals and positioningĬhess strategy is the aspect of chess play concerned with evaluation of chess positions and setting goals and long-term plans for future play. The biggest downside of the Danish Gambit is that it typically only works on inexperienced players. What they don’t see is that their single-mindedness has left avenues open for White’s three most powerful pieces-both Bishops and the Queen-while they themselves have only one piece deployed. They’ve already stolen three of their opponent’s pieces while suffering only a single loss themselves. If Black unwisely opts to advance to b2, White finally uses Queen’s Bishop to stop the marauding pawn.Īt this point, Black is feeling pretty confident. White then moves pawns to d4 and c3, inviting consecutive captures from Black’s single pawn.Īs Black continues collecting pieces, White sneaks out their King’s Bishop to c4. ![]() ![]() In the Danish Gambit, White kicks off the game by moving e2 pawn to e4, prompting Black to counter e7 to e5. The Danish Gambit may be one of the oldest tricks in the book, but it has the potential to end a game in a heartbeat if staged correctly. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |